2,024 news items in 82 days, every one of them in two languages

Intokened publishes crypto and AI news in Russian and English, and the simplest description of it is a count of what the site holds tonight.

“Every number in a story is checked against the source that produced it, and when the check fails, the correction is the story.”

— intokened.com, Editorial standard

From our editorial standard

What the site holds

The scale:

• 2,024 news items and 158 articles since the first publication on 25 June, which is 82 days.
• Exactly half of the news is in English and half in Russian, because every item ships as a pair.
• All 2,182 pieces carry their own cover image, drawn for that material and used nowhere else.

The pace over the last 30 days came to 784 news items, which is about 13 pairs a day, and the last seven days ran at 15 pairs a day. Eight authors carry that between them. The brand marks on the coins in those covers come from files, because an image model draws them wrong.

Reference material sits alongside the feed and does not expire. The glossary holds 87 terms, 65 on crypto and 22 on artificial intelligence, and words inside articles link into it so a reader who stops at a term settles it without leaving the page. The regulation map covers 46 countries, and the editors update those pages without a deployment. The assets section carries 24 written guides, and 16 exchange reviews and 40 calendar entries fill out the rest.

How we check

The counts say nothing about method, so take two cases from this week. Morgan Stanley was reported to have bought $609 million of bitcoin, and we showed it had not: the coins belong to the fund's investors, the bank collects a 0.14% fee, and $610 million is 0.63% of the American spot market, which the fund table shows line by line.

The second: traders were pricing the crypto market structure bill on a platform whose own contracts contradicted each other. Over 58 senators voting yes traded below over 60, which cannot be true because the second is a subset of the first, and we published the gap with the volumes taken from the market itself. Both stories came from reading the underlying data rather than the press release.

The rules we hold ourselves to sit in the editorial policy, and they are short: name the source, link it, show the arithmetic, and print the correction when the arithmetic disagrees. Read anything on the site and check it against the links in the text. The offer is not that you trust us, but that you can recount it yourself.

Nothing here should be taken as financial advice; treat it as information to consider.